Developer-friendly vs enterprise identity platform. Full TCO, use-case matrix, and feature comparison.
Auth0 and Okta solve identity management at different scale/sophistication levels:
| Monthly Active Users | Auth0 Cost/Year | Okta Cost/Year | Cheaper Option |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,000 MAU (startup) | $0 (free tier) | $1,800 (minimum $150/mo) | Auth0: Free |
| 10,000 MAU | $156 (10 × $13 × 12) | $1,800 (minimum) | Auth0: $1,644 cheaper |
| 50,000 MAU | $780 (50 × $13 × 12) | $2,400 (minimum + $60 growth) | Auth0: $1,620 cheaper |
| 100,000 MAU | $1,560 (100 × $13 × 12) | $3,600 (minimum tier for scale) | Auth0: $2,040 cheaper |
| 500,000 MAU | $7,800 (500 × $13 × 12) | $36,000+ (enterprise tier) | Auth0: $28,200 cheaper |
Auth0: Developer-focused (SaaS, consumer apps, B2B SaaS with modern auth needs).
Okta: Enterprise (employee directory, compliance-heavy orgs, legacy system integration).
Auth0: MFA included in free tier (excellent).
Okta: MFA included but requires premium tier for advanced options (phone, biometric).
Auth0: 50+ social providers (Google, GitHub, LinkedIn, etc.). Auth0's bread-and-butter.
Okta: Fewer social options natively; relies on integrations. Better for enterprise SSO.
Auth0: Cloud-native directory (no on-premise AD required).
Okta: Bridges cloud + on-premise (Active Directory integration, legacy support). Better for mixed environments.
Auth0: SOC 2, GDPR compliant. Good for most SaaS.
Okta: SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, FedRAMP (for .gov). Enterprise-grade compliance.
Auth0: Clear per-MAU pricing, free tier generous ($0 until 7.5K MAU).
Okta: Minimum $150/mo regardless of users. Hidden per-user tiers. Less transparent.
Situation: Using Auth0 (50 × $13 × 12 = $7,800/year). Works perfectly; free tier covered first 1,500 MAU.
Outcome: Never needed Okta. Auth0's free tier + Pro tier scaled with product. Okta would cost $1,800/month minimum ($21,600/year) even for this size.
Savings by choosing Auth0: $13,800/year. Auth0 is clear winner for greenfield SaaS.
Situation: Using Okta ($200/mo × 12 = $2,400/year) for employee SSO + legacy system bridge. Auth0 could have worked (50 × $13 = $650/year) but Okta's AD integration essential.
Outcome: Okta required for enterprise IT compliance. Auth0 doesn't natively bridge on-prem + cloud auth (would need custom middleware). Okta premium worth the integration cost.
Cost difference: $1,750/year (Okta premium), but eliminates $50K+ in custom integration work. ROI: Okta is the right choice here.
Situation: Using Auth0 (200 × $13 × 12 = $31,200/year). Evaluated switching to Okta at growth inflection point.
Outcome: At 200K MAU, Okta's fixed $300/mo ($3,600/year) wins vs Auth0 ($31,200/year). But switching cost (2–3 months dev, re-integration with mobile app, web app) = $80K+. Chose to stay on Auth0, negotiate lower rate for volume (Auth0 agreed to $8–$10 per 100 MAU at 200K volume).
Final cost: ~$20K/year (negotiated) vs $3.6K (Okta). Auth0 retained customer with better pricing. Lesson: Always negotiate at scale.
Get your free SaaS audit to review all authentication, identity, and security infrastructure expenses.
PricePulse helps teams optimize identity, security, and infrastructure costs. We've helped 100+ companies find 20–50% savings on Auth/IAM. Start your free audit now.